Friday, March 16, 2012

The War of Biafra




The 20th century atlas lays claim to 1 million deaths owing to The Nigerian Civil War that lasted from 1967 to 1970 : the war of Biafra. Estimates, however, vary from 50,000 to 3,00,000; a wide range indeed, but, "Isn't Nigeria somewhere in Africa? Africa is always wrought with so much tension, all that starvation and death." says Sukriti Sangha, a student of Bangalore University.

Africa is wrought with tension, far and wide, but does the scenario change with time? No, because, even today, the rest of the world views Africa as a remote continent not very many have bothered to discover. Oh sure, "Don't all those celebrities like donate millions? Surely, that must help." On the contrary, nothing could be further from the truth.

To date the International Criminal Court has undertaken the responsibility of bringing to justice people who have committed war crimes, genocide, crimes against humanity and crimes of aggression; but so far,it has been a long and futile road to perdition. Large parts of Africa are merely surviving on the essence of all humanity : hope. This essence thrives in the lives that inhabit the dark continent; for the top 5 'most wanted' criminals cited by the International Criminal Court are, surprise surprise, from Africa.

Moving on to Nigeria, let us pan in on the civil situation before the Nigerian-Biafran War.

Picture yourself living in a society where one day you danced to tribal music at the request of your grandfather and his traditions, another where you swallowed wafer as Holy Communion in the name of God. Imagine having friends that went with you to Sunday Mass and having friends that left for the Mosque on friday, and being completely and totally comfortable with each other's ethnicity and religion. That was the pre-biafran situation : it was one of peace.

But we must remind ourselves, Nigeria was born with the British Empire, who mindlessly charted out a territory on the map, with no regard for the varying traditions and beliefs of the tribes that lived there, and stated that it was country and it was to be called Nigeria. Infamous for their divide and rule policy, the british reigned with an iron fist and encouraged undercurrents of hostility; undercurrents that exploded when Nigeria gained her independence in 1960.

The three predominant groups in Nigeria at the time were the Igbo, which formed between 60-70% of the population in the southeast, the Hausa-Fulani, which formed about 65% of the people in the northern part of the territory and the Yoruba, which formed about 75% of the population in the southwestern part.

The conservative hausas were ruled by an autocratic hierarchy that consisted of 'emirs' who were in turn subservient to the 'sultans', the final political and religious authority in all matters. The Yoruba, likewise, trusted the 'Oba', a series of monarchs. The obas, hoewever,
were more open-minded than the hausas of the north and, in comparison, allowed for greater upward mobility.

The igbo, on the other hand, lived in largely democratic communities where men participated and contributed to societal decision making, hence making it a largely autonomous system of election. In contrast to the Hausas, in igbo society, merit was gained on the basis of accomplishment, whereas in hausas it was gained via status of birth.

These subtle differences in clans were exploited by the British. In the northern hausa influenced areas, the british denied access to missionaries and other western influences. In the south, however, they encouraged the same rampantly. Yorubas took to western philosophy better than the igbos, though the latter group caught up soon enough.

These policies adopted by the 'Land where the sun never sets' proved disastrous in a newly born nation that was teetering on rediscovering and rebuilding itself.

In the month of January, 1966, Major Kaduna Nzeogwu and other Army officers attempted a coup d'etat. It was generally speculated that the coup had been initiated by the Igbos for their own benefit owing to statistics that pointed to the ethnicity of those that were killed. The two major political leaders of the north, the Prime Minister and the Premier, were also executed by Major Nzeogwu, who was of igbo descent. Meanwhile the President, Sir Azikiwe, an Igbo again, was
absent-without-leave, hence largely pinning the blame on all Igbos.

Surprisingly however, evidence proves otherwise. Kaduna was popularly considered as an incorruptible and revolutionary officer who often voiced his discontent with the government. He was an Igbo, but only in name. He hailed from the northern region and spoke Hausa more fluently than he did Igbo. He considered the goverment as a corrupt, malicious organization that had to be disemboweled to restore proper function in Nigeria.

To understand his distress with the government, it is important to note the government that was formed after the departure of the British allocated the northern region with more seats in the parliament than the two southern regions put together. This created wide unrest and many attempts were made to amend the constitution : futile, since the north controlled the parliament. People began to resort to violence, and corruption became rampant in the government to maintain a manageable situation.

'The coup of the Igbos' contained a large number of Hausa soldiers. It was applauded in the North as well as the South for revolting against a corrupt and clumsy federal system. If the coup was Igbo led, why was an Igbo officer also killed? Many tried to justify the death of Lt Col Arthur Unegbe, the Igbo officer in question, but truth be told, the only motive of the coup was to revolt against a corrupt government for the benefit of all the peoples of Nigeria.

The coup failed as Ironsi,the G.O.C(General Officer Commanding), an igbo, rallied the military against the plotters; paradoxical. The gamble of a coup d'etat is generally the death penalty. Ironsi, however, did not bring to court the culprits until six months later, further fueling the suspicions of an Igbo conspiray. In the aftermath, many innocent lives were lost needlessly.
It resulted in General Johnson Aguiyi-Ironsi, an Igbo, succeeding as president of Nigeria, albeit as a military head of state.

In view of all these factors, the coup came to be perceived as a plot nurtured by the igbos all along to aid Ironsi as a total authority and controller of the newly born Nigeria.

Counter coup :

In July 1966, the Northerners carried out a counter-coup. The coup was led by Lt. Col. Mohammed and it placed Lt. Col. Gowon into power, a compromise candidate. Gowon was a Christian from a minority tribe and had an impeccable reputation in the Army. Ethnic tensions due to the coup and counter-coup increased and resulted in the large-scale massacres of Christian Igbo living in the Muslim north.

In the meantime, the military governor of the largely Igbo dominant southeast, Colonel Ojukwu, cited the northern massacres and thus, with the help of the southern parliament, proclaimed the secession of the south-eastern region from Nigeria as the 'Republic of Biafra', an independent nation, on 30 May 1967.

The nascent Biafra had a chronic shortage of weapons, food and all other basic amenities, but it was determined to defend itself. There was widespread sympathy in Europe and other western countries, however only five actively supported Biafra.

Ojukwu and Gowon held several peace accords at Aburi, Ghana, and discussed various factors including the existence of Biafra. Ojukwu managed to convince Gowon and get an agreement to a confederation, rather than a federation, for Nigeria. Gowon, failing to understand the subtle disparity between the two, initially agreed but later reneged his decision.

The outcome wreaked havoc on the Igbo and Yoruba, who had to defend their lives and land to avoid being massacred by a north western population of fairly armed and well equipped nigerians
who had the advantage of fighting in their homeland.

The war of Biafra lasted three years during which thousands died. Hausas, Igbos, Yorubas, all bore victim to a common loss. The Igbos and Yorubas were displaced from their homelands and many lives were lost. Families were destroyed, children lost and murdered, havoc was wrought in a
small, struggling country so many had begun to call their home.

The Biafran war is over, the dead are now forgotten, but the memories of half of a yellow sun fluttering on the flag of The Republic of Biafra, a beloved and cherished land, still bring to life a place where its people stood united and bound together as one.




Wednesday, March 7, 2012

The Libyan Crisis

And another one on Libya. This was written in August '11..so a little outdated.



As one writes this article, fierce gun battles rage in central Tripoli (Capital of Libya), where forces loyal to the regime are making a determined stand against the rebels. Starting as a minor opposition to Gaddafi’s regime, in the remote mountains of north-west Libya, the fighting has climaxed just within 4 months, resulting in the ouster of Col. Muammar Gaddafi, the Arab Country’s supreme leader for the last 42 years. On the face of it - the Libyan Crisis appears to be an extension of the “Arab Spring”- a dramatic chain of events, which swept across the Arab world from Syria to Tunisia. However there are divergent views to it:

According to Michel Chossudovsky, Professor of Economics (emeritus) at the Univ. of Ottawa, and a well known commentator on political events:

“The geopolitical and economic implications of the US-NATO led military intervention in Libya are far-reaching. "Operation Libya" is part of a broader military agenda in the Middle East and Central Asia, which consists in gaining control and corporate ownership over more than 60% of the world's reserves of oil and natural gas, including the oil and gas pipeline routes.”

While there was and can be no justification for the high-handed ways of Gaddafi and his likes; the sudden “Rip Van Winkle” like awakening of the Western (NATO) countries, is also susceptible, as to their true intentions– but then, international conflicts are a zero-sum game.

The new schedule castes of India : The status of India's suffering Muslim Minority

On a rather different and more serious note, here's an article I wrote. Feedback will be duly appreciated :)





Fall From Grace

When the last Mughal Emperor Bahadur Shah Zafar died in Rangoon, lamenting his exile from India, little would he know that in just a matter of one century, the Religion of the Royal Court in Delhi which ruled the Indian Sub-continent for four centuries, would see one of the most dramatic falls from grace in Indian history. The religion which manifested itself in giving India some of the best forms of architectural buildings, the craftsmanship which produced the Koh-i-noor diamond and the intellect that engendered the finest poetry, has to now depend on public charity (one step short of openly begging) even to keep the madrasahs going- the only avenue of education for poor Muslims. To add the ‘icing on the cake’ if you may, the Report in 2006 of the Justice Sachar Committee which was formed by the Govt. of India to determine the latest social, economic and educational condition of the Muslim community of India brought out two striking facts:

• The status of Indian Muslims are below the conditions of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes.

• The overall percentage of Muslims in bureaucracy in India is just 2.5 % where as Muslims constitute above 14% of Indian population.


Beginning Of The End

What led to this slide into misfortune? It all began with the Indian Mutiny of 1857, where though the first shot was fired by Mangal Pandey, a Hindu Sepoy, the driving force behind the mutiny was the disaffected Muslim elite, i.e. the former regional governors of the Mughals and the large landowners who were reduced to penury by the sapping policies of the East India Company. Once the revolt was put down, the British brought to bear, terrible retribution, the lands of those who had assisted the Sepoys, were taken away, largely in the provinces of Awadh (present day UP), Bihar and the Central Provinces (present day MP) which happened to be the areas which were largely affected by the Mutiny and also had sizeable Muslim population of the then Undivided India.

Further, to quote from the article by Aryn Baker, which appeared in Time Magazine (Nov 2008), post the 1857 revolt “Muslim society in India collapsed. The impact was cataclysmic. Muslims went from near 100% literacy to 20% within a half-century. The country's educated Muslim élite was effectively blocked from administrative jobs in the government. Between 1858 and 1878, only 57 out of 3,100 graduates of Calcutta University — then the center of South Asian education — were Muslims.”

The second reason, though not affecting their economic condition but leading to discrimination against them was the British Govt’s, Indian Council’s Act of 1909 (also known as the Morley-Minto Reforms) which provided for separate electorates for Hindus & Muslims in the first elections to be held in India. This was a malevolent act on the part of the British to prevent a joint Hindu-Muslim front from emerging and thereby threatening British rule in India. It was this hesitation of certain Muslim leaders - in a democratic election where 75% of the population was Hindu (Undivided India) they (25%) of the population would be permanently subject to Majority rule – that the British exploited. This created distrust between the two communities, which lasts to this day and has become a cause of discrimination against the Muslim minority (which reduced from 25% to 14%, after partition)


From Bad To Worse

Thus, what began with the Mutiny of 1857 could never be reversed, the economic, political and social conditions of the Muslims kept getting worse, despite the rapid economic growth of the country since the mid 1990s which has led to better standards of living for all sections of the society, including the minorities (except Muslims). In fact in the past two decades which have seen rapid economic development of the country, the Muslims rather than benefitting from it, have further withdrawn into their shell. This fact was widely known and it was this glaring inconsistency in India’s growth story which led the Prime Minister of India Dr. Manmohan Singh to constitute the Sachar Committee in 2005 (the task of which has been discussed above).
In addition to the above two main findings of Committee, many other disturbing trends were discovered which warrant their mention here:

i) In the field of literacy the Committee found that the rate among Muslims is much below than the national average. 25 per cent of children of Muslim parents in the 6-14 year age group have either never attended school or have dropped out.

ii) According to the Sachar Committee, only one out of 25 undergraduate students and one out of 50 post-graduate students in ‘premier colleges’ are Muslims. The percentage of graduates in poor households pursuing post-graduate studies is significantly lower for Muslims: Hindus General (29 per cent); SCs/STs (28 per cent); OBCs (23 per cent); Muslims (16 per cent).
iii) The unemployment rate among Muslim graduates is the highest among all Socio-Religious Categories (SRCs), poor as well as non-poor.

From the above findings it becomes clear that even the educated Muslim youth is faced with very high levels of unemployment . It is due this that they become easy targets for the Anti National Elements (ANEs) and terrorists , who manage to recruit them. This can only be stopped by providing more employment opportunities to the Muslim youth.

There have been two instances in the recent past which have tarnished India’s secular credentials. The first was the demolition of the Babri Masjid in Dec. 1992 and the second were the Godhra Riots in 2002. What is shocking is that both these outrages had the blessings of their respective State Govts. and the guilty rather than being punished have managed to play the religious card and garnered votes from the majority community, going on to become Chief Ministers and even Deputy Prime Minister. In addition to their economic dilemma, the Muslims are now in a position when they cannot trust their own Govt., as the Govt. which was supposed to protect them from the mobs, turned against them (as in Godhra)

Thus, it is high time that concrete steps are taken to address the social and economic backwardness of the Indian Muslims at the earliest as a grave humanitarian crisis in the form of poverty, discrimination and lack of opportunities, is facing 14% of the population of this country.

Tuesday, March 6, 2012




Today you gave me a little bunch
Of white and yellow daisies
And promises
As the breeze fluttered
In through a window in the wall
And my tealight sputtered and died
What was it you said?
I forget

I need photographs
To show me how to feel now
Captured images of sleazy dimly lit bars
And filthy motel rooms and cigarettes
Everything else lies forgotten
Flashes of dances
And trains
In the night
Of making love on tattered sheets
Of you lying beside me while I slept
For the first time

There was once a time
When every thought slit my insides
And I would clatter to find my heels
And a dress to match
And a dress to wear and heels to match
And now my insides are shut airtight
Lest I remember

Wasted nights sitting on the couch
In your bedroom, with the strains of a song
Dying in the dark
And thoughts plummeting and hearts surging
And a cigarette clutched between your
Long fingers

Will you die? Will you make me a drink?
As the day draws to a close
And I recede into routine laughter
Properly timed with the right amount of tinkle
Did you promise
you would teach me
to forget?
Or did you promise me
You would never cut up your leg
Like a chopping board with
87 cuts
and a teardrop

Will you ask me what time it is?
(I'm the only one who has a watch)
As you walk out through the courtyard door
into a familiar garden
And the sun slowly hits your face

Monday, March 5, 2012

Voices

My sweet,
How does it begin?
We laughed through
Days of thunder and light
And purple fields

And rain

Down the alleyway the ice wagon flew
It must pause at
The vicariousness
Of the hours
Of haloes glinting
In the moonlight to
Melodies of the universe

Of realizations
And acceptance
Of paths tread
Differently
To a similar horizon

Must it not?
I do not
Know
Or understand
Norms
Any longer

Must not the wind
Long to play with your hair
And caress
Your sweet face
Turned towards the sun?

Monday, January 23, 2012

The Window in the Wall

It was a feathery morning full of surprises as the soft breeze tickled the curtained windows. Your shadow fell across my floor and merged with the deep tones of wood, caressing your silhouette as though it were welcoming you in its embrace. The sheer curtains fluttered as you moved slowly from one window to the next, peeping to check for any sign of life. The dampened earth sent a whiff of rain and of smoke as you gently moved it apart, rustling softly away to send shards of aureate sunlight slanting onto the empty bed. 'Boo!' you screamed and sent your tinkling laugh dancing into the dusty room. Then you saw, as your eyes slowly widened, that the decrepit silent room was empty.

Saturday, November 19, 2011

Do not stand at my grave and weep,
I am not there; I do not sleep.
I am a thousand winds that blow,
I am the diamond glints on snow,
I am the sun on ripened grain,
I am the gentle autumn rain.
When you awaken in the morning’s hush
I am the swift uplifting rush
Of quiet birds in circling flight.
I am the soft starlight at night.
Do not stand at my grave and cry,
I am not there; I did not die.

Mary Frye